Polity

Governance

44 real PYQs·6 concepts ↓·2 concept drills↑ Increasing·Asked 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020

📝 Drill the PYQs

Governance

Loading questions...

📚 The concepts · 6

tap any tile for full passage

Co-operative Societies (97th Constitutional Amendment)

›**97th Amendment Act, 2011** — effective **February 15, 2012** (Laxmikant p.1082)
›Three changes: Article 19(1)(c) [FR], Article 43-B [DPSP], Part IX-B [Articles 243-ZH to 243-ZT] (Laxmikant p.1082)
›Article 43-B: "The state shall endeavour to promote **voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control and professional management** of cooperative societies" (Laxmikant p.1082)

+ 28 facts · tap to read

The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2011 (effective February 15, 2012) gave constitutional status and protection to co-operative societies through three changes: (1) it made the right to form co-operative societies a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(c); (2) it added a new Directive Principle under Article 43-B directing the State to promote voluntary, autonomous, and democratically-functioning co-operatives; and (3) it added a new Part IX-B (Articles 243-ZH to 243-ZT) titled "The Co-operative Societies." The amendment aimed to correct systemic weaknesses: indefinitely postponed elections, nominated office bearers dominating, lack of accountability, and poor professional management. "Co-operative societies" is a State List subject (Entry 32, Seventh Schedule), but the 97th Amendment imposed minimum constitutional requirements uniformly.

›**97th Amendment Act, 2011** — effective **February 15, 2012** (Laxmikant p.1082)
›Three changes: Article 19(1)(c) [FR], Article 43-B [DPSP], Part IX-B [Articles 243-ZH to 243-ZT] (Laxmikant p.1082)
›Article 43-B: "The state shall endeavour to promote **voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control and professional management** of cooperative societies" (Laxmikant p.1082)
›Maximum number of directors of a co-operative society: **21** (Laxmikant p.1083)
›Co-opted members (with banking/management/finance expertise): max **2** (in addition to 21); they have **no voting rights** in elections (Laxmikant p.1083)
›Reservation on board: **1 seat for SCs/STs** and **2 seats for women** (Laxmikant p.1083)
›Term of elected board members: **5 years** from date of election (Laxmikant p.1083)
›**Functional directors** of a co-operative society shall also be members of the board and such members shall be **excluded for counting the total number of directors** (that is, twenty-one) (Laxmikant p.1083)
›Board elections shall be conducted **before the expiry of the term** of the outgoing board so that newly elected members assume office immediately upon expiry (Laxmikant p.1083)
›Board cannot be superseded for more than **6 months** (for cooperative banks other than multi-state banks, max **1 year**) (Laxmikant p.1083)
›Accounts must be audited at least **once per financial year**; audit to be completed within **6 months** of close of financial year (Laxmikant p.1084)
›Annual returns to be filed within **6 months** of close of financial year (Laxmikant p.1084)
›For multi-state cooperative societies: "State Legislature" → "Parliament", "State Government" → "Central Government" (Laxmikant p.1085)
›Existing inconsistent state laws continued for **1 year** from February 15, 2012 (Laxmikant p.1085)
›Key articles: 243-ZH (definitions), 243-ZI (incorporation), 243-ZJ (board composition), 243-ZK (elections), 243-ZL (supersession), 243-ZM (audit), 243-ZN (general body meetings), 243-ZO (right to information), 243-ZP (returns), 243-ZQ (offences), 243-ZR (multi-state), 243-ZS (UTs), 243-ZT (continuance) (Laxmikant p.1086)
›The state legislature may make provisions for the **incorporation, regulation and winding-up** of co-operative societies based on the principles of voluntary formation, democratic member control, member-economic participation and autonomous functioning (Laxmikant p.1083)
›The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections to a co-operative society shall vest in such body, as may be provided by the state legislature (Laxmikant p.1083).
›A board may be superseded or kept under suspension for reasons including **persistent default, negligence in duties, acts prejudicial to the society's interests, stalemate in board constitution or functions, or election body failure to conduct elections** (Laxmikant p.1083).
›A board cannot be superseded or kept under suspension if there is **no Government shareholding or loan or financial assistance or any guarantee by the Government** (Laxmikant p.1083).
›In case of supersession, the administrator appointed must arrange for elections within **six months** and hand over management to the elected board (Laxmikant p.1083).
›Auditors or auditing firms for co-operative societies are appointed by the **general body** from a panel approved by the State Government or an authorized body (Laxmikant p.1084).
›The state legislature may make provisions for the **maintenance of accounts** by co-operative societies and lay down **minimum qualifications and experience** of auditors and auditing firms eligible for auditing (Laxmikant p.1084).
›The audit report of the accounts of an **apex co-operative society** shall be laid before the state legislature (Laxmikant p.1084).
›The annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within **six months** of the close of the financial year (Laxmikant p.1084).
›The state legislature may make provisions for member access to **books, information and accounts**, ensuring member participation in management, and providing co-operative education and training (Laxmikant p.1084).
›Returns filed annually must include: annual report of activities, audited statement of accounts, plan for surplus disposal, list of by-law amendments, declaration on general body meeting/election dates, and other Registrar-required information (Laxmikant p.1084).
›Offences include: wilfully making false returns/information, disobeying summons/orders, employers failing to pay deducted amounts within 14 days, officers failing to hand over property, and corrupt practices during elections (Laxmikant p.1084-1085).
›The provisions of Part IX-B apply to Union Territories, though the President may direct otherwise for any UT or part thereof (Laxmikant p.1085).
›The 97th Amendment aimed to revitalise co-operative institutions due to **indefinitely postponed elections, dominance of nominated office bearers/administrators, reduced accountability, and inadequate professionalism in management** (Laxmikant p.1085).
›"Co-operative societies" is listed in **Entry 32 of the State List** of the Seventh Schedule (Laxmikant p.1085).
›The Central Government commitment was to ensure co-operative societies function in a **democratic, professional, autonomous and economically sound manner**, with reforms providing deterrence for violations and accountability to members and stakeholders (Laxmikant p.1085).

Administrative Reforms

›The NCRWC was set up by Government of India resolution in 2000 and submitted its report in 2002.
›The 11-member Commission was headed by M.N. Venkatachaliah, former Chief Justice of India.
›The Commission identified corruption, insensitivity, and inefficiency of administration as causes of extralegal systems and loss of faith in democratic institutions.

+ 9 facts · tap to read

Administrative Reforms comprise systemic changes recommended to improve the functioning of governance institutions and public administration. The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC), established in 2000 and headed by M.N. Venkatachaliah, identified significant administrative failures over fifty years of constitutional working and proposed comprehensive reforms. The Commission identified corruption, insensitivity, and inefficiency as core administrative problems that had resulted in extralegal systems, parallel economies, and loss of public faith in democratic institutions. Administrative reforms were framed as essential to strengthen public service delivery, ensure accountability, and restore citizen confidence in government. Key reform areas included: restructuring the civil service through autonomous Civil Service Boards; introducing lateral entry into senior government positions; amending constitutional protections under Article 311 to both protect honest officials and penalize dishonest ones; implementing right to information legislation with oaths of transparency replacing secrecy; enacting whistle-blower protection acts; and establishing mechanisms for forfeiture of illegally acquired property. The Commission emphasized that officials should commit to principles of good governance before commencing their careers and that public servants must recognize themselves as servants of the people rather than authority figures above them.

All key facts

›The NCRWC was set up by Government of India resolution in 2000 and submitted its report in 2002.
›The 11-member Commission was headed by M.N. Venkatachaliah, former Chief Justice of India.
›The Commission identified corruption, insensitivity, and inefficiency of administration as causes of extralegal systems and loss of faith in democratic institutions.
›Constitutional protection for Services under Article 311 had been exploited by dishonest officials to avoid consequences of wrongdoing.
›There was pervasive non-accountability and bureaucratic corruption causing public disenchantment with democratic institutions.
›The Commission's recommendations on administration included 58 constitutional amendments, 86 legislative measures, and 105 matters for executive action.
›Administrative reforms proposed included restructuring civil service through autonomous Civil Service Boards for managing personnel policy including placements, promotions, and transfers.
›Lateral entry into government jobs above joint secretary level was recommended to be allowed.
›Right to information should be guaranteed and oaths of transparency substituted for oaths of secrecy.
›Public Interest Disclosure Acts (Whistle-blower Acts) were recommended to fight corruption and mal-administration.
›Officials should swear to abide by principles of good governance before starting their careers.

Public Services (All-India, Central, and State Services)

›**Three All-India Services**: IAS, IPS, IFS (Indian Forest Service); ICS replaced by IAS in 1947, Indian Police (IP) replaced by IPS; IFS created in **1966** (Laxmikant p.1105)
›**All-India Services Act, 1951**: authorized the Central government to make rules in consultation with state governments for recruitment and service conditions of AIS members (Laxmikant p.1105)
›IAS/IPS members belong to state cadres; Centre has no cadre. Salaries/pensions paid by **states** (Laxmikant p.1105–06)

+ 29 facts · tap to read

Public services in India are classified into three categories: All-India Services (common to both Centre and states), Central Services (exclusive to Centre), and State Services (exclusive to states). Part XIV of the Constitution (Articles 308–314) governs these services. The key constitutional principles are: (1) recruitment and service conditions regulated by Parliament/state legislatures; (2) members hold office "during the pleasure" of the President/Governor (doctrine of pleasure); (3) Article 311 provides safeguards against arbitrary dismissal. All-India Services are the apex services shared between Centre and states — currently IAS, IPS, and IFS. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel is called the "Father of All-India Services." New All-India Services can be created only if the Rajya Sabha passes a resolution by two-thirds majority of members present and voting.

All key facts

›**Three All-India Services**: IAS, IPS, IFS (Indian Forest Service); ICS replaced by IAS in 1947, Indian Police (IP) replaced by IPS; IFS created in **1966** (Laxmikant p.1105)
›**All-India Services Act, 1951**: authorized the Central government to make rules in consultation with state governments for recruitment and service conditions of AIS members (Laxmikant p.1105)
›IAS/IPS members belong to state cadres; Centre has no cadre. Salaries/pensions paid by **states** (Laxmikant p.1105–06)
›Ultimate control of All-India Services: **Central Government**; immediate control: **state governments** (Laxmikant p.1106)
›Disciplinary action against AIS officers can only be taken by **Central Government** (Laxmikant p.1106)
›**Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel** = "Father of All-India Services" (Laxmikant p.1106)
›Central services classified since 1974 into Groups A, B, C, D (previously Class I–IV) — changed on recommendation of **Third Pay Commission** (Laxmikant p.1107)
›62 Group A Central Services; **Indian Foreign Service (IFS central)** is highest in terms of prestige/pay among Central services (Laxmikant p.1108)
›**Article 309**: Parliament/state legislatures regulate recruitment and conditions; until then, President/Governor may make rules (Laxmikant p.1109)
›**Article 310**: Members hold office "during the **pleasure** of the President/Governor" (Laxmikant p.1110)
›**Article 311**: Two safeguards against dismissal: (a) dismissal not by authority subordinate to appointing authority; (b) inquiry required with opportunity of being heard (Laxmikant p.1110–11)
›**42nd Amendment Act, 1976** abolished the second opportunity (representation against proposed punishment) — now punishment may be imposed based on inquiry findings directly (Laxmikant p.1112)
›Three exceptions where inquiry safeguard (Art. 311) is NOT required: (a) conviction on criminal charge; (b) not practicable to hold inquiry (reasons in writing); (c) security of state (President/Governor satisfied) (Laxmikant p.1111)
›**Article 312**: New All-India Services (including All-India Judicial Service) can be created if **Rajya Sabha passes resolution by 2/3 majority** of members present and voting (Laxmikant p.1113)
›All-India Judicial Service should not include posts inferior to **District Judge** (Laxmikant p.1113)
›**33.33% of senior IAS/IPS/IFS posts** to be filled by promotion from state services (Laxmikant p.1108)
›Difference between dismissal and removal: **dismissal disqualifies** for future government employment; removal does NOT (Laxmikant p.1114)
›**State services** members occupy lower positions in the administrative hierarchy of the state compared to members of All-India Services (IAS, IPS, IFS) (Laxmikant, p. 1108).
›Common state services across all states include Civil Service, Police Service, Forest Service, Agricultural Service, Medical Service, Veterinary Service, Fisheries Service, Judicial Service, Public Health Service, Educational Service, Co-operative Service, Registration Service, Sales Tax Service, Jail Service, and Service of Engineers (Laxmikant, p. 1108-1109).
›State services are named with the state as a prefix (e.g., AP Civil Service, AP Police Service for Andhra Pradesh) (Laxmikant, p. 1109).
›Among state services, the civil service (administrative service) is considered the most prestigious (Laxmikant, p. 1109).
›State services are classified into four categories: Class I (Group A), Class II (Group B), Class III (Group C), and Class IV (Group D) (Laxmikant, p. 1109).
›State services are also classified into **gazetted class** (Class I/Group A and Class II/Group B) and **non-gazetted class** (Class III/Group C and Class IV/Group D) (Laxmikant, p. 1109).
›Names of members of the **gazetted class** are published in the Government Gazette for appointment, transfer, promotion, and retirement, while non-gazetted are not (Laxmikant, p. 1109).
›Members of the **gazetted class** enjoy privileges denied to non-gazetted class members, and are called 'officers' while non-gazetted are called 'employees' (Laxmikant, p. 1109).
›Promotions from state services to senior IAS, IPS, and IFS posts (not exceeding 33.33%) are made on the recommendation of a selection committee presided over by the Chairman or a member of UPSC (Laxmikant, p. 1109).
›**Recruitment definition**: Includes any method provided for inducting a person in public service like appointment, selection, deputation, promotion and appointment by transfer (Laxmikant, ch66-public-services.md)
›**Conditions of service**: Include pay, allowances, periodical increments, leave, promotion, tenure or termination of service, transfer, deputation, various types of rights, disciplinary action, holidays, hours of work and retirement benefits like pension, provident fund, gratuity (Laxmikant, ch66-public-services.md)
›**Article 309** empowers Parliament and state legislatures to regulate recruitment and conditions of service; until such laws are made, President or Governor can make rules (Laxmikant, ch66-public-services.md)
›Under Article 309, Parliament or state legislature can impose 'reasonable' restrictions on Fundamental Rights of public servants in interests of integrity, honesty, efficiency, discipline, impartiality, secrecy, neutrality, anonymity, devotion to duty (Laxmikant, ch66-public-services.md)
›**Exception to Article 310**: President or Governor may provide compensation in two cases: (i) if post is abolished before contractual period expires, or (ii) if required to vacate post for reasons not connected with misconduct — applicable only to new entrants not already members of defence/civil services (Laxmikant, ch66-public-services.md)
›**'Reasonable opportunity of being heard'** under Article 311 includes: (a) opportunity to deny guilt and establish innocence by being told charges and allegations; (b) opportunity to defend by cross-examining witnesses and examining own witnesses; (c) disciplinary authority must supply inquiry officer's r

borrowed featuresconstituent assemblyequality political and socialfunctions of constitutionpreambleindian parliamentary group

National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC)

›Set up by **Government resolution in 2000**; submitted report in **2002** (Laxmikant p.1274)
›Chairman: **M.N. Venkatachaliah** (former CJI); 11 members total (Laxmikant p.1274)
›Task: **advisory and recommendatory** only; Parliament may accept or reject recommendations (Laxmikant p.1274)

+ 26 facts · tap to read

The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) was set up by a Government of India resolution in **2000** and submitted its report in **2002**. The 11-member commission was chaired by **M.N. Venkatachaliah**, former Chief Justice of India. Its mandate was to examine, in light of 50 years of experience, whether existing constitutional provisions are adequate for efficient governance and socio-economic development — and recommend changes within the framework of parliamentary democracy, without touching the **basic structure** of the Constitution. The Commission made **249 recommendations** total: 58 requiring constitutional amendments, 86 requiring legislative measures, and 105 achievable through executive action. It had no pre-set agenda — it identified 11 areas of study on its own. The commission's central finding was that "the fifty years of the working of the Constitution is substantially a saga of missed opportunities," reflecting significant gaps between constitutional promise and actual delivery across political, economic, social, administrative, and judicial systems.

All key facts

›Set up by **Government resolution in 2000**; submitted report in **2002** (Laxmikant p.1274)
›Chairman: **M.N. Venkatachaliah** (former CJI); 11 members total (Laxmikant p.1274)
›Task: **advisory and recommendatory** only; Parliament may accept or reject recommendations (Laxmikant p.1274)
›**249 total recommendations**: 58 constitutional amendments + 86 legislative + 105 executive action (Laxmikant p.1281)
›11 self-identified areas of study: parliamentary democracy functioning, electoral reforms, socio-economic development pace, promoting literacy/employment/social security, Union-State relations, decentralisation/Panchayati Raj, enlargement of Fundamental Rights, effectuation of Fundamental Duties and DPSPs, fiscal/monetary legal control, administrative standards (Laxmikant p.1275–76)
›Terms of reference clearly specified that recommended changes should be **within the framework of parliamentary democracy and without interfering with the 'basic structure' or 'basic features' of the Constitution** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›The commission clarified that its task was to **review the working of the Constitution and not to rewrite it** and its function was only **recommendatory and advisory in nature** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**Key recommendations — Fundamental Rights**:
›Extend Article 15/16 discrimination prohibition to "ethnic or social origin, political or other opinion, property or birth"
›**Freedom of speech and expression (Article 19) should explicitly include 'the freedom of the press and other media, the freedom to hold opinions and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas'** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›New FRs proposed: right against torture; right to compensation for illegal deprivation of life/liberty; **right to leave and return to India**; right to privacy; right to rural wage employment (minimum 80 days/year); right to speedy justice; right to safe drinking water/ecology; **right to care and assistance and protection (in case of children)**; **right to equal justice and free legal aid** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**Right to education (Article 21-A) should be enlarged to provide free education until age 14 for all children, and until age 18 for girls and members of SCs and STs** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**Regarding preventive detention (Article 22): maximum period of six months and advisory board consisting of a chairman and two other members who are serving judges of any high court** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›Sikhism, Jainism, Buddhism to be treated as separate from Hinduism (Article 25 reform)
›**NCRWC recommended against the suspension of the enforcement of Fundamental Rights under Articles 17, 23, 24, 25, and 32 during a national emergency (in addition to existing protection for Articles 20 and 21)** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›Ninth Schedule judicial review protection to be restricted to agrarian reforms, reservations, and DPSPs under Article 39(b)/(c)
›**Key recommendations — Right to Property**:
›**Article 300-A should be recast to state that deprivation or acquisition of property must be by authority of law and only for a public purpose, with no arbitrary deprivation, and a right to 'suitable rehabilitation' for SCs and STs if their land is acquired** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**Key recommendations — Directive Principles**:
›**The heading of Part-IV should be amended to read as 'Directive Principles of State Policy and Action'** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**A new Directive Principle on control of population should be added** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**An independent National Education Commission should be set-up every five years** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**An Inter-Faith Commission should be established to promote inter-religious harmony and social solidarity** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**Key recommendations — Fundamental Duties**:
›**Duty to vote at elections, actively participate in the democratic process of governance and to pay taxes** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**To foster a spirit of family values and responsible parenthood in the matter of education, physical and moral well-being of children** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**Duty of industrial organizations to provide education to children of their employees** (M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch80-national-commission-to-review-the-working-of-the-constitution.md)
›**Key recommendations — Parliament/Legislatures**:
›**Privileges of legislators should be defined and delimited; Article 105 may be amended to clarify that the immunity enjoyed by members under parliamentary privileges does not cover corr

borrowed featuresconstituent assemblyequality political and socialfunctions of constitutionpreamblearticle 368 amendment procedure

Official Language

›**Hindi in Devanagari script** is official language of Union (Article 343); numerals = **international form of Indian numerals** (not Devanagari) (Laxmikant p.1090)
›English permitted for **15 years** from 1950; then continued by Official Languages Act, 1963 (indefinitely) (Laxmikant p.1091)
›**Official Languages Act, 1963** amended **1967** — made English compulsory (in addition to Hindi) in certain cases (Laxmikant p.1091)

+ 31 facts · tap to read

Part XVII of the Constitution (Articles 343–351) deals with official languages in India. It is divided into four parts: Language of the Union, Regional Languages, Language of the Judiciary and Texts of Laws, and Special Directives. Hindi in Devanagari script is the official language of the Union, but English was permitted to continue for 15 years (1950–1965) and has been continued indefinitely by the Official Languages Act, 1963 (amended 1967 to make use of English compulsory in certain cases). The international form of Indian numerals (not Devanagari) is used for Union official purposes. The Eighth Schedule originally listed 14 languages; now (2019) lists **22 languages**. A "classical language" category was created in 2004 with 6 languages granted status by 2019.

All key facts

›**Hindi in Devanagari script** is official language of Union (Article 343); numerals = **international form of Indian numerals** (not Devanagari) (Laxmikant p.1090)
›English permitted for **15 years** from 1950; then continued by Official Languages Act, 1963 (indefinitely) (Laxmikant p.1091)
›**Official Languages Act, 1963** amended **1967** — made English compulsory (in addition to Hindi) in certain cases (Laxmikant p.1091)
›English is **link language** for Union-State and inter-State communications (two states may agree to use Hindi between themselves) (Laxmikant p.1092)
›**Supreme Court** proceedings must be in English only — Parliament has not provided for Hindi in SC (Laxmikant p.1094)
›High Court proceedings: Governor may (with President's consent) authorize Hindi or state official language, but **judgements/decrees/orders must remain in English** (Laxmikant p.1094)
›Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities to be appointed by the President (Article 350-B) (Laxmikant p.1095)
›**Eighth Schedule — 22 languages** (2019): Assamese, Bengali, Bodo, Dogri, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Kashmiri, Konkani, Maithili, Malayalam, Manipuri, Marathi, Nepali, Odia, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Santhali, Sindhi, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu (Laxmikant p.1096)
›Additions to 8th Schedule: Sindhi (21st Amendment, 1967), Konkani/Manipuri/Nepali (71st Amendment, 1992), Bodo/Dogri/Maithili/Santhali (92nd Amendment, 2003) (Laxmikant p.1096)
›**Classical Language** category created **2004**; 6 languages as of 2019: Tamil (2004), Sanskrit (2005), Telugu (2008), Kannada (2008), Malayalam (2013), Odia (2014) (Laxmikant p.1097)
›Classical language criteria: antiquity of texts ≥ 1,500–2,000 years; body of ancient literature; literary tradition original and not borrowed (Laxmikant p.1099)
›**Committee of Parliament on Official Language** set up 1976 (10 years after Official Languages Act 1963); 30 MPs — 20 from LS, 10 from RS (Laxmikant p.1097)
›**B.G. Kher Commission** (1955) examined official language; report examined by Gobind Ballabh Pant committee (1957) (Laxmikant p.1091)
›**96th Amendment Act, 2011** substituted "Odia" for "Oriya" in the Constitution (Laxmikant p.1097)
›The **Official Language Commission** under B.G. Kher submitted its report in 1956, and it was examined by a parliamentary committee chaired by Gobind Ballabh Pant in 1957 (Laxmikant p.1091).
›The **Official Languages Act, 1963**, provides for the continued use of English indefinitely (without any time-limit) for official purposes of the Union and transaction of business in Parliament (Laxmikant p.1091).
›In states, the legislature may adopt any language in use or Hindi as the official language. Until then, English continues as the official language (Laxmikant p.1092).
›The choice of a state's official language is not limited to those in the Eighth Schedule (Laxmikant p.1092).
›The Official Languages Act (1963) mandates English for communication between the Union and non-Hindi states (Laxmikant p.1092).
›A Hindi communication between a Hindi and non-Hindi state must be accompanied by an English translation (Laxmikant p.1092).
›The President may direct the official recognition of a language spoken by a substantial proportion of a state's population if they desire it, to protect linguistic minority interests (Laxmikant p.1093).
›All proceedings in the Supreme Court and High Courts, and authoritative texts of bills, acts, ordinances, orders, rules, regulations, and bye-laws at Central and state levels must be in English until Parliament provides otherwise (Laxmikant p.1093).
›A state legislature can prescribe the use of any language (other than English) for bills, acts, etc., but an English translation must be published (Laxmikant p.1093).
›The Official Languages Act of 1963 states that Hindi translations of central acts, ordinances, etc., published under the President's authority are deemed authoritative (Laxmikant p.1093).
›Every bill introduced in Parliament must be accompanied by a Hindi translation (Laxmikant p.1093).
›The Governor, with President's consent, can authorize Hindi or other state official language for High Court judgments, decrees, and orders, but they must be accompanied by an English translation (Laxmikant p.1093).
›Every aggrieved person has the right to submit a representation for grievance redressal in any language used in the Union or state (Laxmikant p.1095).
›States and local authorities must provide adequate facilities for primary stage education in the mother tongue for linguistic minorities (Laxmikant p.1095).
›The Centre has a duty to promote the spread and development of Hindi to become the lingua franca of India's composite culture, enriching it from Hindustani and other Eighth Schedule languages, primarily Sanskrit (Laxmikant p.1095).
›The Parliamentary Committee on Official Language was constituted in 1976 as per the Official Languages Act (1963), comprising 30 members (20 LS, 10 RS) (Laxmikant p.1097).
›The Chairman of the Committee on Official Language is elected by its members, with the Union Home Minister conventionally serving as Chairman (Laxmikant p.1098).
›Benefits of classical language status include financial assistance for a center of excellence, two major awards for scholars, and the potential for professional chairs in Central Universities (Laxmikant p.1099).
›The Official Languages Act was amended in 1967 to make the use of English compulsory in certain cases, including resolutions, general orders, rules, notifications, administrative reports, press communications, official papers laid before Parliament, contracts, agreements, licences, permits, and notices issued by the Central Government or related entities. (Laxmikant p.1091, footnote 3)
›The provision regarding adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage was added by the **7th Amendment Act of 1956** on the recommendation of the States Reorganisation Commission. (Laxmikant p.1095, footnote 5)

ancient scripts of indiaclassical languages of indialanguage families of indiascheduled languages eighth scheduleborrowed featuresconstituent assembly

National Integration Council

›**Key definitions**: Myron Weiner (avoidance of divisive movements), H.A. Gani (socio-psychological process of unity/solidation), Rasheeduddin Khan (cohesion not fusion), Dr. Radhakrishnan (consciousness that must awaken people) (Laxmikant p.1244–45)
›**Four major obstacles**: (1) Regionalism, (2) Communalism, (3) Casteism, (4) Linguism (Laxmikant p.1245–55)
›**Regionalism** forms: secessionist demands, separate statehood demands, UT full statehood demands, inter-state boundary/water disputes, militant regional organisations, "sons of the soil" theory (Laxmikant p.1246–47)

+ 21 facts · tap to read

National integration is the socio-psychological and educational process through which citizens develop feelings of unity, solidarity, and common citizenship. In India, it is challenged by regionalism, communalism, casteism, and linguism — all outcomes of the politicisation of social identities. The Government has established the **National Integration Council (NIC)** and the **National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH)** as institutional mechanisms to address these challenges. Rasheeduddin Khan's definition captures the nuance: "National integration means cohesion not fusion, unity but not uniformity, reconciliation but not merger." The concept involves political, economic, social, cultural, and psychological dimensions, as well as their inter-relations.

All key facts

›**Key definitions**: Myron Weiner (avoidance of divisive movements), H.A. Gani (socio-psychological process of unity/solidation), Rasheeduddin Khan (cohesion not fusion), Dr. Radhakrishnan (consciousness that must awaken people) (Laxmikant p.1244–45)
›**Four major obstacles**: (1) Regionalism, (2) Communalism, (3) Casteism, (4) Linguism (Laxmikant p.1245–55)
›**Regionalism** forms: secessionist demands, separate statehood demands, UT full statehood demands, inter-state boundary/water disputes, militant regional organisations, "sons of the soil" theory (Laxmikant p.1246–47)
›**Communalism** roots: 1909, 1919, 1935 British Acts introduced communal representation for Muslims, Sikhs; politicisation of religion (Laxmikant p.1247)
›**Casteism**: politicisation of caste; B.K. Nehru's observation: reservations in vestigal form emphasise caste identity (Laxmikant p.1249)
›**Linguism**: creation of Andhra (1953) triggered demand for state reorganisation on linguistic lines; SRC (1953–55) headed by Fazl Ali; states reorganised 1956 (Laxmikant p.1250)
›**Three-language formula** not implemented in Tamil Nadu (only two languages: English and Tamil) (Laxmikant p.1251)
›**National Integration Council (NIC)**: constituted **1961** after National Conference on 'Unity in Diversity'; PM = Chairman (Laxmikant p.1251)
›**NIC initial composition (1961)**: Prime Minister as Chairman, Central Home Minister, Chief Ministers of states, seven leaders of political parties, Chairman of UGC, two educationists, Commissioner for SCs and STs, and seven other PM-nominated persons (Laxmikant p.1251)
›**NIC objectives**: examine national integration problems in all aspects and make recommendations; however, initial recommendations largely remained on paper with no implementation effort by Centre or states (Laxmikant p.1251)
›**NIC 1968 revival**: increased membership from 39 to 55 members, including representatives of industry, business, and trade unions; met at Srinagar; adopted resolution condemning tendencies destructive to national solidarity; set up committees on regionalism, communalism, and linguism; however, nothing tangible was achieved (Laxmikant p.1251–52)
›**NIC 1980 revival**: made membership more broad-based, discussed communal harmony, unrest in North-East, and education system; set up a standing committee to monitor divisive forces (Laxmikant p.1252)
›**NIC 1986 reconstitution**: membership further increased, recognised terrorism in Punjab as an attack on unity, integrity, and secular ideals, passed a resolution to fight it, and set up a 21-member committee for continuous functioning, tasked with formulating short and long-term proposals for communal harmony and national integrity (Laxmikant p.1252)
›**NIC 1990 reconstitution**: National Front Government under V.P. Singh increased strength to 101, including PM as chairman, Central ministers, CMs, leaders of parties, representatives of women, trade, industry, academics, journalists, and public figures; discussed Punjab, Kashmir, violence by secessionists, communal harmony, and Ram Janmabhomi-Babri Masjid; no concrete result was achieved (Laxmikant p.1252)
›**NIC 2005 reconstitution**: UPA Government under Manmohan Singh, 103 members, after a 12-year gap (last meeting 1992); included Central ministers, CMs, party leaders, chairpersons of National Commissions, public figures, business, media, labor, and women representatives (Laxmikant p.1252–53)
›**NIC functions (2005)**: forum for effective initiative/interaction on national concerns, review national integration issues, and make recommendations (Laxmikant p.1253)
›**NIC 14th meeting (2008)**: held amidst communal violence, agenda included promoting education for minorities/SCs/STs, elements of national integration, removing regional imbalances/caste/identity divisions, preventing extremism, promoting communal harmony, and equitable development (Laxmikant p.1253)
›**NIC 2010 reconstitution**: UPA Government under Manmohan Singh, 147 members; aimed at combating communalism, casteism, and regionalism, including Union Ministers, Leaders of Opposition in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, Chief Ministers of all states and union territories with Legislatures, leaders of national and regional political parties, chairpersons of national commissions, eminent journalists, public figures, and representatives of business and women's organisations (Laxmikant p.1253)
›**Standing Committee of NIC (October 2010)**: constituted with Union Home Minister as Chairman, four Union Ministers, nine Chief Ministers, and five co-opted members from NIC, to finalise agenda items for NIC meetings (Laxmikant p.1253)
›**NIC 15th meeting (2011)**: agenda included curbing communalism/violence, approach to Communal Violence Bill, promoting communal harmony, eliminating discrimination (minorities/STs), state/police handling of civil disturbances, curbing radicalisation of youth (Laxmikant p.1253–54)
›**NIC 16th meeting (2013)**: passed resolutions condemning violence, strengthening harmonious relations, resolving differences within law, condemning atrocities on SCs/STs, condemning sexual abuse, ensuring women's freedom and equal opportunities (Laxmikant p.1254)
›**16 NIC meetings** held between 1962 and 2013 (Laxmikant p.1254)
›**Table of NIC Meetings**: Lists dates for 16 meetings from June 1962 to September 2013, including specific dates: First Meeting 2nd and 3rd June 1962; Second Meeting 20th to 22nd June 1968; Third Meeting 12th November 1980; Fourth Meeting 21st January 1984; Fifth Meeting 7th April 1986; Sixth Meeting 12th September 1986; Seventh Meeting 11th April 1990; Eighth Meeting 22nd September 1990; Ninth Meeting 2nd November 1991; Tenth Meeting 31st December 1991; Eleventh Meeting 18th July 1992; Twelfth Meeting 23rd November 1992; Thirteenth Meeting 31st August 2005; Fourteenth Meeting 13th October 2008; Fifteenth Meeting 10th September 2011; Sixteenth Meeting 23rd September 2013 (Laxmikant p.1254)
›**National

citizen and nation statecitizenship equality and rightsnature of citizenshipchief minister