›**RPA 1950** provisions: allocation of seats in House of People, State Legislative Assemblies and Councils; delimitation of constituencies; election officers; electoral rolls; manner of filling Council of States seats by UT representatives; barring civil court jurisdiction (Laxmikant p.1178–79)
›**RPA 1951** provisions: qualifications/disqualifications for Parliament/State Legislature membership; notification of general elections; administrative machinery; registration of political parties; conduct of elections; free supply of electoral material to recognised parties; election disputes; corrupt practices and offences; powers of ECI on disqualification matters; bye-elections and time limits; barring civil courts (Laxmikant p.1179–80)
›**Corrupt practices under RPA 1951**: bribery, undue influence, false statements, use of vehicles for voters, promotion of enmity, booth capturing (Laxmikant p.1180)
+ 7 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Election laws in India consist principally of: (1) Representation of the People Act, 1950 (RPA 1950) — deals with allocation of seats and preparation of electoral rolls; (2) Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA 1951) — deals with conduct of elections, qualifications/disqualifications, corrupt practices, election disputes; and (3) Delimitation Act, 2002 — provides for redrawing of constituency boundaries.
These Acts operationalise the constitutional framework in Articles 81, 170–171, 324–329. Civil courts have no jurisdiction over election matters; election petitions go to High Courts.
All key facts
›**RPA 1950** provisions: allocation of seats in House of People, State Legislative Assemblies and Councils; delimitation of constituencies; election officers; electoral rolls; manner of filling Council of States seats by UT representatives; barring civil court jurisdiction (Laxmikant p.1178–79)
›**RPA 1951** provisions: qualifications/disqualifications for Parliament/State Legislature membership; notification of general elections; administrative machinery; registration of political parties; conduct of elections; free supply of electoral material to recognised parties; election disputes; corrupt practices and offences; powers of ECI on disqualification matters; bye-elections and time limits; barring civil courts (Laxmikant p.1179–80)
›**Corrupt practices under RPA 1951**: bribery, undue influence, false statements, use of vehicles for voters, promotion of enmity, booth capturing (Laxmikant p.1180)
›**Delimitation Act, 2002** (amended 2003, 2008, 2016): re-draws constituency boundaries based on 2001 census; re-fixes SC/ST reserved seats (Laxmikant p.1181)
›Current delimitation based on **1971 census**; 2002 Act provided delimitation on 2001 census basis without changing total seat count (Laxmikant p.1181)
›Delimitation Commission directed to complete work by **July 31, 2008** (Laxmikant p.1182)
›**Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959**: certain offices of profit do NOT disqualify holders from being/becoming MPs (Laxmikant p.1183)
›**Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952** (amended 1974, 1977, 1997): regulates election to President and Vice-President (Laxmikant p.1183)
›Key rules: Registration of Electors Rules, 1960; Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961; Prohibition of Simultaneous Membership Rules, 1950; Anti-defection rules (Members of LS/RS Disqualification on Ground of Defection Rules, 1985) (Laxmikant p.1184)
›Key orders: **Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968** — specifies, reserves, allots symbols; recognition of parties (Laxmikant p.1185)
borrowed featuresconstituent assemblyequality political and socialfunctions of constitutionpreamblehigh court
FPTP vs Proportional Representation
›FPTP used for: Lok Sabha, State Assemblies
›PR used for: President, Vice-President, Rajya Sabha, Vidhan Parishads
›FPTP: winner = most votes in constituency (no majority needed)
+ 8 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
India uses two different election systems for different purposes.
**First Past the Post (FPTP) System:**
- The entire country is divided into 543 constituencies
- Each constituency elects one representative
- The candidate who secures the highest number of votes in that constituency is declared elected
- The winning candidate does NOT need to secure a majority (more than 50%) — only more votes than all other candidates
- This is also called the Plurality System
- Used for: Lok Sabha elections and State Legislative Assembly elections
The famous example from the text: In 1984 Lok Sabha elections, Congress won 415 of 543 seats (more than 80%) with only 48% of the votes. BJP got 7.4% votes but less than 1% seats. Similarly, in the 1952 general elections, the Congress obtained 45 per cent of the total votes but managed to win 74 per cent of the seats. The Socialist Party, with more than 10 per cent of the votes, could not even win three per cent of the seats. This disproportionality is a characteristic outcome of the FPTP system, where the division of non-Congress votes among rival parties allowed the Congress to win significantly more seats than its vote share.
**Proportional Representation (PR) System:**
- Seats are allocated to each party in proportion to its share of votes
- Two variations: (1) entire country as one constituency (Israel, Netherlands), and (2) multi-member constituencies (Argentina, Portugal)
- Voters vote for a party, not a candidate — representatives are elected from party preference lists
- India uses PR on a limited scale for indirect elections: President, Vice-President, Rajya Sabha, and Vidhan Parishads
**Why India adopted FPTP for Lok Sabha/Assemblies:**
1. Simplicity — common voters can understand it without specialised knowledge
2. Clear choice presented — voters endorse a specific candidate, not just a party
3. Constituency-based accountability — voters know who their representative is and can hold them accountable
4. Stable government — FPTP gives the largest party bonus seats, facilitating stable parliamentary majorities
5. Coalition-building across social groups — encourages voters from different social groups to unite around a candidate in a locality
6. Discourages parties that draw votes only from one caste or community
**FPTP tends to produce:** Two-party competition (though India developed multi-party coalitions after 1989)
**PR tends to produce:** Multi-party systems with coalition governments (example: Israel)
All key facts
›FPTP used for: Lok Sabha, State Assemblies
›PR used for: President, Vice-President, Rajya Sabha, Vidhan Parishads
›FPTP: winner = most votes in constituency (no majority needed)
›PR: seats proportional to vote share; voters choose party not candidate
›1984 Congress example: 48% votes → 80%+ seats (disproportionality of FPTP)
›543 Lok Sabha constituencies (unchanged since 1971)
›FPTP advantages: simplicity, local accountability, stable government
›PR advantage: proportional representation of smaller parties and minorities
›1952 Congress example: The Congress secured 74% of seats in the first Lok Sabha elections with only 45% of the total votes. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md, p. 32
›1952 Socialist Party example: The Socialist Party, despite securing more than 10% of the votes in 1952, won less than 3% of the seats due to FPTP's disproportionality. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md, p. 32
›FPTP mechanism: The party that obtains more votes than others tends to secure a much larger, disproportionate share of seats, often due to fragmented opposition votes. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md, p. 32
election commissionreservation of constituenciesuniversal adult franchisecoalition governmentvice president
Elections — Constitutional Provisions, Process, and Machinery
›**Part XV, Articles 324–329** deal with elections (Laxmikant p.1158–77)
›Article 324: superintendence, direction, control of elections vested in **Election Commission** (Laxmikant p.1158)
›One general electoral roll — no communal representation/separate electorates (abolished by Constitution) (Laxmikant p.1158)
+ 14 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Articles 324–329 in Part XV of the Constitution provide the framework for elections in India. The key provisions are: independent Election Commission (Article 324); one general electoral roll for every constituency (abolishing communal electorates); universal adult franchise from age 18 (Article 326); and Parliament's power to make laws on elections. The Election Commission (ECI) conducts elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and offices of President and Vice-President. State Election Commissions handle Panchayat/Municipality elections.
India uses the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system for Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections — the candidate with the highest number of votes in a constituency wins, regardless of absolute majority.
All key facts
›**Part XV, Articles 324–329** deal with elections (Laxmikant p.1158–77)
›Article 324: superintendence, direction, control of elections vested in **Election Commission** (Laxmikant p.1158)
›One general electoral roll — no communal representation/separate electorates (abolished by Constitution) (Laxmikant p.1158)
›**Article 326**: elections on basis of **adult franchise**; voting age = **18 years** (reduced from 21 by 61st Amendment Act, 1988, effective March 28, 1989) (Laxmikant p.1159)
›Disqualification from voting: non-residence, unsound mind, crime, corrupt/illegal practice (Laxmikant p.1159)
›**Article 329**: validity of laws relating to delimitation of constituencies cannot be questioned in any court; Delimitation Commission orders are final (Laxmikant p.1159)
›**Article 323-B**: empowers legislature to establish an election tribunal; jurisdiction of courts (except SC special leave) may be excluded — but in **Chandra Kumar case (1997)**, SC declared this unconstitutional (Laxmikant p.1159–60)
›**Election petition** = not an ordinary civil suit; triable by **High Court**; appeals to **Supreme Court** (since 1966) (Laxmikant p.1159)
›**FPTP system** used for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies (Laxmikant p.1169)
›Maximum gap between last session of dissolved Lok Sabha and recalling of new House = **6 months** (Laxmikant p.1162)
›Model Code of Conduct (MCC) agreed to by all parties in **1968**; first effectively used in **1991** (Laxmikant p.1164)
›ECI tries to ensure polling station within **2 km** of every voter; no polling station > **1500 voters** (Laxmikant p.1165)
›**EVMs** first used in 1998 (experimental); used in all state elections and by-elections in 2003; used in all 2004 Lok Sabha elections (Laxmikant p.1165–66)
borrowed featuresconstituent assemblyequality political and socialfunctions of constitutionpreambleuniversal adult franchise
Election Commission of India
›Constitutional basis: Article 324
›Covers: Parliament, State Legislatures, President, Vice-President elections — NOT local body elections
›Single-member until 1989; multi-member since 1993
+ 31 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Article 324 of the Indian Constitution provides for an independent Election Commission for the "superintendence, direction and control of the electoral roll and the conduct of elections" in India. This covers all elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President. The Supreme Court has agreed that these words give the Election Commission a decisive role in virtually everything related to elections.
**Structure:** The Election Commission can be either a single member or a multi-member body. It was single-member until 1989, when two Election Commissioners were added briefly before reverting to single-member status. In 1993, two Election Commissioners were again appointed and the Commission has remained multi-member since then. The Commission currently consists of a Chief Election Commissioner and two Election Commissioners. The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) presides but does not have more powers than the other Election Commissioners — all three have equal powers as a collective body.
**Appointment:** The CEC and Election Commissioners are appointed by the President of India on the advice of the Council of Ministers. This means the ruling party could appoint partisan persons — a concern that has led many to suggest appointment should also require consultation with the Leader of Opposition and the Chief Justice of India.
**Security of tenure:** CEC and Election Commissioners are appointed for a six-year term or continue till the age of 65, whichever is earlier. The CEC can be removed before the expiry of term only by the President if both Houses of Parliament make such a recommendation with a special majority. Election Commissioners can be removed by the President of India.
**Functions:**
- Supervision and preparation of up-to-date voters' lists
- Determining timing of elections and preparing election schedule (including notification, filing of nominations, polling, and counting)
- Power to postpone or cancel elections if free and fair poll is not possible
- Implementing the model code of conduct
- Ordering a re-poll or recount
- According recognition to political parties and allotting symbols
**Limitations:** The Election Commission is NOT responsible for the conduct of local body elections — those are conducted by State Election Commissioners who work independently.
The Election Commission has limited staff of its own. During elections, state and central government officers are assigned election duty and come under the Election Commission's control. The EC can transfer officers, stop transfers, and take action against those who fail to act in a non-partisan manner.
All key facts
›Constitutional basis: Article 324
›Covers: Parliament, State Legislatures, President, Vice-President elections — NOT local body elections
›Single-member until 1989; multi-member since 1993
›Currently consists of a Chief Election Commissioner and two Election Commissioners — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch71-elections.md
›CEC and Election Commissioners: equal powers as a collective body
›Appointed by: President on advice of Council of Ministers
›Tenure: 6 years or 65 years of age, whichever is earlier
›Removal of CEC: special majority of both Houses of Parliament + Presidential order
›Removal of Election Commissioners: by President of India (simpler process)
›Does NOT supervise panchayat/municipal elections
›The Election Commission of India was set up in January 1950. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›Sukumar Sen became the first Chief Election Commissioner. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›The first general elections were initially expected in 1950 but were postponed twice due to the mammoth task of organization. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
borrowed featuresconstituent assemblyequality political and socialfunctions of constitutionpreambleindian parliamentary group
Reservation of Constituencies
›Reserved constituencies: all voters can vote, but candidates must be from the reserved community
›Separate electorates (rejected): only community members could vote for their own representative
›SC reserved seats in Lok Sabha: 79; ST reserved seats: 41 (out of 543)
+ 27 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Reservation of constituencies is the mechanism to ensure fair representation of oppressed social groups in the FPTP electoral system. Under FPTP, dominant social groups and castes can win everywhere, leaving oppressed groups unrepresented. The Constitution makers were aware of this and provided for reserved constituencies.
**System of reserved constituencies:** In this system, all voters in a constituency are eligible to vote, but candidates must belong only to the particular community or social section for which the seat is reserved. This is distinct from "separate electorates" (discussed below).
**Contrast with separate electorates:** Under the British-introduced separate electorates, only voters belonging to a particular community could vote for the representative from that community. The Constituent Assembly rejected this system — many members expressed fear that it would not suit their purposes. The text quotes a Muslim member: "Separate electorates have been a curse to India, have done incalculable harm to this country... We want to merge in the nation."
**Who is covered:** The Constitution provides for reservation of seats in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. This provision was initially made for 10 years and has been extended by successive constitutional amendments. At the time of writing: 79 seats reserved for SC and 41 for ST out of 543 Lok Sabha seats. The number of reserved seats is in proportion to their share in the total population.
**Delimitation Commission:** Boundaries of constituencies and determination of reserved constituencies is done by the Delimitation Commission. It is:
- Appointed by the President of India
- Works in collaboration with the Election Commission
- Fixes the quota of reserved constituencies in each State based on proportion of SC/ST in that State
- For ST: picks constituencies with highest proportion of ST population
- For SC: picks constituencies with higher SC population but also spreads them across different regions of the State (since SC population is generally spread evenly)
- Reserved constituencies can be rotated each time delimitation is undertaken
**Women's reservation:** The Constitution does not provide for reservation of Lok Sabha/Assembly seats for women. Reservation for women has been provided in rural and urban local bodies. A similar provision for Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas would require a constitutional amendment — proposed several times but not yet passed (as of the time of writing).
**Panchayati Raj reservation (73rd Amendment Act):** The 73rd Amendment Act of 1992 specifically provides for the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in every panchayat (at all three levels: village, intermediate, and district) in proportion to their population in that panchayat area. It also mandates the reservation of not less than one-third of the total seats for women in panchayats at all levels, including seats reserved for SC and ST women. Furthermore, not less than one-third of the offices of chairpersons in panchayats at each level are reserved for women. State legislatures are authorized to provide for reservation of seats or chairperson offices for backward classes in panchayats. The reservation for SCs and STs in panchayats, similar to legislative bodies, is linked to Article 334 which specifies a time limit (currently till 2020). However, the reservation for SCs in panchayats is not applicable to Arunachal Pradesh, as it is inhabited fully by indigenous tribal people and has no Scheduled Castes, a provision added by the 83rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 2000.
**PESA Act reservation in Scheduled Areas:** Under the PESA Act of 1996, which extends Panchayati Raj provisions to Scheduled Areas, the reservation for Scheduled Tribes in panchayats shall not be less than one-half of the total number of seats, and all seats of Chairpersons of Panchayats at all levels shall be reserved for Scheduled Tribes. State governments can also nominate Scheduled Tribes who have no representation in the intermediate or district level panchayats, up to one-tenth of the total elected members.
**Constitutional framework and rationale:** The Constitution (Part XVI, Articles 330-342A) makes special provisions for SCs, STs, backward classes, and Anglo-Indians. These provisions aim to realize the objectives of equality and justice as laid down in the Preamble. They may be classified as permanent or temporary (some are permanent features while others operate only for specified periods) and as protective (protecting from injustice and exploitation) or developmental (promoting socio-economic interests). The special representation for Anglo-Indians exists because, as a numerically small and dispersed community, they would not likely win seats through elections.
All key facts
›Reserved constituencies: all voters can vote, but candidates must be from the reserved community
›Separate electorates (rejected): only community members could vote for their own representative
›SC reserved seats in Lok Sabha: 79; ST reserved seats: 41 (out of 543)
›Reserved seats proportional to SC/ST share in population
›Initially for 10 years; extended by successive amendments
›Delimitation Commission: appointed by President; works with Election Commission
›SC constituencies spread across regions; ST constituencies chosen by highest ST proportion
›Reserved constituencies can be rotated at each delimitation
›Women's reservation in Lok Sabha/Assemblies: NOT in Constitution; exists in local bodies
›The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act provides for reservation of seats for SCs and STs in every panchayat proportional to their population. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›The 73rd Amendment Act mandates reservation of not less than one-third of total seats for women in every panchayat, including for SC and ST women. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›Not less than one-third of the total offices of chairpersons in panchayats at each level are reserved for women. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
borrowed featuresconstituent assemblyequality political and socialfunctions of constitutionpreamblearticle 368 amendment procedure
Electoral Reforms
›FPTP to PR switch: would ensure proportional representation but may reduce stable majorities
›Women's reservation: one-third seats proposed but not yet enacted for Parliament/Assemblies
›Criminal-background candidates: proposed bar even if appeal is pending
+ 27 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Electoral reforms refer to proposals to improve the election system. The text acknowledges that "no system of election can ever be perfect" and that "any democratic society has to keep searching for mechanisms to make elections free and fair to the maximum."
Various proposals discussed include:
1. **Changing from FPTP to PR:** Changing the election system from FPTP to some variant of PR would ensure parties get seats in proportion to votes received.
2. **Women's reservation:** At least one-third of seats in Parliament and Assemblies should be reserved for women.
3. **State funding of elections:** Stricter control over money in elections; election expenses should be paid by government from a special fund.
4. **Barring candidates with criminal cases:** Candidates with any criminal case should be barred from contesting even if their appeal is pending before a court.
5. **Ban on caste and religious appeals:** Complete ban on use of caste and religious appeals in campaigns.
6. **Regulation of political parties:** Law to regulate functioning of political parties and ensure they function in transparent and democratic manner.
The text notes there is no consensus about these suggestions. Even if consensus existed, there are limits to what laws and formal provisions can do. Free and fair elections ultimately require candidates, parties, and those involved in the election process to agree to abide by the spirit of democratic competition.
Two other means (beyond legal reforms) for ensuring elections reflect democratic aspirations: (1) citizens being more vigilant and actively involved in political activities, and (2) political institutions and voluntary organisations functioning as watchdogs.
All key facts
›FPTP to PR switch: would ensure proportional representation but may reduce stable majorities
›Women's reservation: one-third seats proposed but not yet enacted for Parliament/Assemblies
›Criminal-background candidates: proposed bar even if appeal is pending
›State funding of elections: proposed to reduce influence of money
›Legal reforms alone insufficient — civic vigilance and watchdog institutions also needed
›The **Representation of the People Act, 1950** provides for the registration of electors for Parliamentary Constituencies, Assembly, and Council Constituencies, as well as qualifications and disqualifications for such registration.
›The **Registration of Electors Rules, 1960** provide for the preparation and publication of electoral rolls. (ch72)
›The **Representation of the People Act, 1951** contains provisions relating to qualifications and disqualifications for membership of Parliament and State Legislatures, notification of general elections, administrative machinery for elections, registration of political parties, conduct of elections, corrupt practices and electoral offences, and decision of election disputes. (ch72)
›The **Delimitation Act, 2002** was enacted to set up a Delimitation Commission for effecting delimitation on the basis of the 2001 census to correct distortion in sizes of electoral constituencies. (ch72)
›The Delimitation Commission was tasked with carrying out delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly constituencies and re-fixing seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes on the basis of the 2001 census. (ch72)
election commissionfptp vs proportional representationreservation of constituenciesuniversal adult franchiserepresentation of people act 1950representation of people act 1951
Universal Adult Franchise
›Universal adult franchise: voting right for all adult citizens regardless of religion, caste, education, gender, income
›Voting age: 21 until 1989; reduced to 18 by constitutional amendment in 1989
›Constituent Assembly: universal suffrage was the only provision passed without debate
+ 15 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Universal adult franchise means that all adult citizens of the country are eligible to vote in elections. It is described as one of the most important decisions of the framers of the Indian Constitution. They guaranteed every adult citizen in India the right to vote regardless of religion, caste, education, gender, or income.
In the Constituent Assembly, the introduction of universal suffrage was the only provision passed without virtually any debate — a testament to the complete democratic consensus on this point.
**Age qualification:** Till 1989, an adult Indian meant a citizen above the age of 21. An amendment to the Constitution in 1989 reduced the eligibility age to 18.
**Right to contest elections:** All citizens have the right to stand for election and become representatives. Different minimum age requirements apply:
- Lok Sabha and State Assembly: candidate must be at least 25 years old
- A person who has undergone imprisonment for two or more years for some offence is disqualified from contesting elections
There are no restrictions based on income, education, class, or gender on the right to contest elections. The text says "our system of election is open to all citizens."
The text notes that critics argued giving the vote to everyone irrespective of educational qualification was not right. However, the Constitution makers had "a firm belief in the ability and worth of all adult citizens as equals in the matter of deciding what is good for the society." The implementation of universal adult franchise in India, particularly during the first general elections (1951-52), was seen by many as a "bold and risky" experiment, given that democracy had previously existed mainly in prosperous, literate countries. Critics predicted its failure, calling it "the biggest gamble in history" due to the country's poverty and high illiteracy rates. However, India's successful conduct of these elections, involving 17 crore eligible voters, proved these sceptics wrong and became a landmark event, demonstrating that democratic elections could be held universally regardless of poverty or lack of education.
The Constitution provides that elections to the Lok Sabha and the state assemblies are to be on the basis of adult franchise. Every person who is a citizen of India and is at least 18 years of age is entitled to vote, provided they are not disqualified under provisions of the Constitution or any law made by the appropriate legislature (Parliament or state legislature) on grounds such as non-residence, unsound mind, crime, or corrupt or illegal practices. The Constitution explicitly abolishes the system of communal representation and separate electorates. It also states that no person is ineligible for inclusion in the electoral roll solely on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or any of them.
All key facts
›Universal adult franchise: voting right for all adult citizens regardless of religion, caste, education, gender, income
›Voting age: 21 until 1989; reduced to 18 by constitutional amendment in 1989
›Constituent Assembly: universal suffrage was the only provision passed without debate
›Minimum age to contest Lok Sabha/Assembly elections: 25 years
›Disqualification from contesting: imprisonment of 2 or more years
›No restrictions on right to contest based on income, education, class, or gender
›The first general election was a "mammoth exercise," the largest election ever conducted on this scale in the world.
›During the preparation of the first electoral rolls, the names of nearly 40 lakh women were not recorded, being listed only as "wife of..." or "daughter of...".
›The Election Commission refused to accept these entries and ordered a revision or deletion.
›The first general elections involved 17 crore eligible voters, of whom only 15% were literate.
›India's experiment with universal adult franchise was considered "very bold and risky" by many, with an Indian editor calling it "the biggest gamble in history."
›The elections, originally expected in 1950, were postponed twice and finally held from October 1951 to February 1952, though referred to as the 1952 election.
borrowed featuresconstituent assemblyequality political and socialfunctions of constitutionpreambleelection commission
›Tasks for the first election included delimitation of electoral constituencies and preparing electoral rolls. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›During the preparation of the first electoral rolls, the Election Commission refused to accept entries for nearly 40 lakh women listed only as "wife of…" or "daughter of…" and ordered revisions or deletions. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›The first general election was unprecedented in scale, involving 17 crore eligible voters, electing approximately 3,200 MLAs and 489 Members of Lok Sabha. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›Only about 15% of the eligible voters in the first general election were literate, necessitating special voting methods. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›Over 3 lakh officers and polling staff were trained by the Election Commission for the first general elections. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›The first general elections were held from October 1951 to February 1952, taking six months to complete campaigning, polling, and counting. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›The 1952 general election was considered a landmark in the history of democracy globally, proving that democratic elections could be held in conditions of poverty or illiteracy. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›In the first general election, voters were given a blank ballot paper to drop into a box for their chosen candidate, with each candidate's election symbol displayed on their box within the polling booth (approx. 20 lakh steel boxes were used). — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›After the first two elections, the voting method changed: ballot papers listed all candidates and their symbols, and voters had to stamp their choice. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) were introduced by the Election Commission towards the end of the 1990s, and by 2004, the entire country had shifted to EVMs. — NCERT Class 12 — Politics in India Since Independence, ch02-era-of-one-party-dominance.md
›The State Election Commissioner, appointed by the Governor, can only be removed in the same manner and on the same grounds as a judge of the state high court. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›The conditions of service for the State Election Commissioner cannot be varied to their disadvantage after appointment. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›The state legislature may make provisions for all matters relating to elections to the panchayats. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›The President may appoint regional commissioners to assist the Election Commission. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch42-election-commission.md
›The conditions of service and tenure for election commissioners and regional commissioners are determined by the President. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch42-election-commission.md
›On 16 October 1989, two election commissioners were appointed to cope with increased work due to lowering the voting age from 21 to 18 years. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch42-election-commission.md
›The two posts of election commissioners were abolished in January 1990, reverting the Election Commission to a single-member body. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch42-election-commission.md
›Chief Election Commissioner and other election commissioners receive salaries, allowances, and perquisites similar to a judge of the Supreme Court. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch42-election-commission.md
›In case of a difference of opinion among the Chief Election Commissioner and/or other election commissioners, the matter is decided by the Commission by majority. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch42-election-commission.md
›Election Commissioners hold office for a term of six years or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch42-election-commission.md
›The Chief Election Commissioner can only be removed by the President based on a resolution pass
›State legislatures can make provisions for reservation of seats or chairperson offices for backward classes in panchayats. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›Reservation for SCs and STs in panchayats ceases after the period specified in Article 334. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›The reservation of seats for SCs in panchayats is not applicable to Arunachal Pradesh (added by 83rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2000). — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›Under the PESA Act of 1996, reservation for Scheduled Tribes in panchayats in Scheduled Areas shall not be less than one-half of the total seats. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›Under the PESA Act, all seats of Chairpersons of Panchayats at all levels in Scheduled Areas are reserved for Scheduled Tribes. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›State governments can nominate Scheduled Tribes without representation in intermediate or district level panchayats in Scheduled Areas, up to one-tenth of elected members. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch38-panchayati-raj.md
›The territories acquired from Portuguese (Goa, Daman and Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli) and French (Puducherry) were constituted as Union Territories. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch40-union-territories.md
›Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, and Goa were formerly Union Territories before being elevated to statehood. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch40-union-territories.md
›Union Territories have been created for reasons like political and administrative consideration (Delhi, Chandigarh), cultural distinctiveness (Puducherry, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu), strategic importance (Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep), and special treatment for backward and tribal people (Mizoram, Manipur, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, which later became states). — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch40-union-territories.md
›In 2019, the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir was bifurcated into two separate Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir (with a legislature) and Ladakh (without a legislature). — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch40-union-territories.md
›Reasons for creating UTs of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh in 2019 included the demand for UT status for Ladakh due to its large area, sparse population, and difficult terrain, and the internal security situation fueled by cross-border terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch40-union-territories.md
›The Constitution (Part XVI, Articles 330-342A) makes special provisions for SCs, STs, backward classes, and Anglo-Indians regarding reservation in legislatures, special representation in legislatures, reservation in services and posts, educational grants, and the appointment of national commissions. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch68-special-provisions-relating-to-certain-classes.md
›The special provisions can be permanent or temporary, and protective (protecting from injustice/exploitation) or developmental (promoting socio-economic interests). — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch68-special-provisions-relating-to-certain-classes.md
›The President specifies which castes or tribes in each state/UT are SCs and STs, in consultation with the state's governor, but Parliament alone can include or exclude any caste/tribe from this Presidential notification. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch68-special-provisions-relating-to-certain-classes.md
›The 102nd Amendment Act of 2018 empowered the President to specify socially and educationally backward classes (OBCs) in relation to a state or union territory, with inclusion/exclusion from the Central List only by Parliament. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch68-special-provisions-relating-to-certain-classes.md
›An 'Anglo-Indian' is defined in the Constitution as a person of European male descent domiciled in India, born in India to habitually resident parents. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch68-special-provisions-relating-to-certain-classes.md
›Seats are reserved for SCs and STs in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies based on population ratios. — M. Laxmikanth — Indian Polity (6th Edition, 2019), ch68-special-provisions-relating-to-certain-classes.md
›The President
›The Delimitation Act, 2002 specified that the Delimitation Commission shall endeavour to complete its work within a period not later than July 31, 2008. (ch72)
›The **Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961** facilitates conduct of fair and free elections to the Parliament and State Legislatures. (ch72)
›The **Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959** declares that certain offices of profit under the Government shall not disqualify holders thereof for being chosen as members of Parliament. (ch72)
›The **Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968** provides for the specification, reservation, choice and allotment of symbols at elections in parliamentary and assembly constituencies, for the recognition of political parties in relation thereto. (ch72)
›The **Registration of Political Parties (Furnishing of Additional Particulars) Order, 1992** provides for furnishing of additional particulars by associations or bodies of individual citizens of India seeking registration as a political party with the Election Commission of India. (ch72)
›The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC), headed by M.N. Venkatachaliah, recommended electoral reforms. (ch80)
›The NCRWC suggested that any person charged with an offense punishable with imprisonment for a maximum term of five years or more should be disqualified from being a member of Parliament or State Legislature. (ch80)
›The NCRWC recommended that any person convicted of heinous crimes (e.g., murder, rape, smuggling, dacoity) should be permanently debarred from contesting any political office. (ch80)
›The NCRWC proposed that criminal cases against politicians and election petitions be disposed of speedily, possibly by special courts or special election benches in High Courts. (ch80)
›Proposals for state funding of elections should be deferred until robust regulatory mechanisms for political party functioning and strict financial limits are in place. (ch80)
›Candidates should not be allowed to contest elections simultaneously for the same office from more than one constituency. (ch80)
›The election code of conduct should be given legal sanctity, and its violation should attract penal action. (ch80)
›The NCRWC suggested examining the system of "run off contest" requiring 50% plus one vote for election, as opposed to the First-Past-The-Post system, for a more representative democracy. (ch80)
›An independent candidate who loses election three times consecutively should be permanently debarred from contesting for the same office. (ch80)
›The minimum percentage of valid votes polled to prevent forfeiture of deposit should be increased to 25% from the current 16.67%. (ch80)
›The NCRWC identified eleven areas of study on constitutional review, including electoral reforms and standards in political life as the second area. (ch80)
›The issue of eligibility of non-Indian born citizens or those whose parents or grandparents were citizens of India to hold high offices such as President, Vice-President, Prime Minister and Chief Justice of India was recommended for examination through a political process after national dialogue. (ch80)
›The NCRWC recognized that there is pervasive misuse of the electoral process and the electoral system is unable to prevent the entry of persons with criminal record into the portal of law-making institutions. (ch80)
›The 13th Lok Sabha represented only 27.9 per cent of the total electorate and the Legislature of U.P. represented only 22.2 per cent of electorate respectively, indicating inadequate representative character due to inherent weakness of the electoral system. (ch80)
›The NCRWC recommended that the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners should be appointed on the recommendation of a body consisting of the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, and the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. (ch80)
›The successful conduct of the 1952 general election proved critics wrong and became a landmark in the history of democracy globally.
›India's success demonstrated that democratic elections could be held in conditions of poverty or lack of education anywhere in the world.
›Universal adult franchise makes democracy broad-based, enhances the self-respect and prestige of the common people, upholds the principle of equality, enables minorities to protect their interests, and opens up new hopes and vistas for weaker sections.
›The Constitution has abolished the system of communal representation and separate electorates.
›Article 326 of the Constitution deals with elections to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assemblies of states to be on the basis of adult suffrage.
›Disqualification grounds for voting: non-residence, unsound mind, crime, or corrupt or illegal practice