›*IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change):**
›Not a research organisation — ASSESSES and synthesises existing climate science
›Established 1988 by WMO (World Meteorological Organization) and UNEP
+ 35 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Multiple international organisations and frameworks govern climate change science, policy, and finance. UPSC tests the distinction between bodies — which is scientific (IPCC), which is under which UN body (UNFCCC under UNEP/WMO), and specific mandates.
All key facts
›*IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change):**
›Not a research organisation — ASSESSES and synthesises existing climate science
›Established 1988 by WMO (World Meteorological Organization) and UNEP
›Produces Assessment Reports; provides scientific basis for climate negotiations
›Three Working Groups: WG I (physical science), WG II (impacts, adaptation, vulnerability), WG III (mitigation)
›Nobel Peace Prize 2007 (shared with Al Gore)
›*UNFCCC (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change):**
›Framework convention from Rio Earth Summit 1992
›Secretariat in Bonn, Germany
›Conference of Parties (COP): annual meeting of all parties
›Key COPs: Rio 1992 (UNFCCC adopted), Kyoto 1997 (Kyoto Protocol), Copenhagen 2009, Cancun 2010, Paris 2015 (COP21, Paris Agreement), Glasgow 2021 (COP26)
›*Kyoto Protocol:**
›Legally binding; only Annex I (developed) countries had binding targets
›First commitment period: 2008–2012
›Three flexibility mechanisms:
›1. CDM (Clean Development Mechanism): developed country funds project in developing country → earns CERs
›2. Joint Implementation: between two Annex I countries
›3. Emissions Trading: Annex I countries can trade emissions units
›USA never ratified; Canada withdrew; Russia, Japan did not take second period targets
›*Paris Agreement (2015):**
›All countries (not just Annex I) submit NDCs (Nationally Determined Contributions)
›Goal: limit warming to well below 2°C, pursue 1.5°C
›Entered into force 2016
›$100 billion/year climate finance commitment by developed countries (NOT $1,000 billion — a common UPSC trap)
›Article 6: carbon markets and non-market approaches (including cooperative approaches)
›*GGGI (Global Green Growth Institute):**
›International inter-governmental organisation
›Supports developing countries' green growth strategies
›*GCF (Green Climate Fund):**
›Financial mechanism under UNFCCC
›Supports developing countries in mitigation and adaptation
›Capitalised at $100 billion/year from developed countries
›*WRI (World Resources Institute) and WBCSD:**
›Both associated with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (NOT GCCA)
›GHG Protocol = corporate/project accounting and reporting standard
›*GCCA (Global Climate Change Alliance):**
›Initiative of the European Union
›Supports dialogue and cooperation between EU and developing countries on climate change
India and Climate Change — Position, Actions, NAPCC
›*India's GHG profile (2010 data):**
›Total GHG emissions: 2,136.84 million tonnes CO₂ equivalent
›Sector breakdown: Energy = 71%, Industrial processes and product use = 8%, Agriculture = 18%, Waste = 3%
+ 30 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
India's approach to climate change centres on adaptation as the primary focus, with specific mitigation commitments. India recognises its historical low emissions and argues for equitable burden-sharing, while also demonstrating voluntary actions through the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) and its eight missions.
All key facts
›*India's GHG profile (2010 data):**
›Total GHG emissions: 2,136.84 million tonnes CO₂ equivalent
›Sector breakdown: Energy = 71%, Industrial processes and product use = 8%, Agriculture = 18%, Waste = 3%
›Carbon sinks (forests and croplands) offset ~12% of emissions
›Net national GHG = 1,884.31 million tonnes CO₂ equivalent
›Per capita GHG: 1.56 tCO₂ equivalent — less than 1/3 of world average
›*India's climate positions:**
›Primary focus: adaptation; secondary: mitigation
›Voluntary pledge: reduce emission intensity of GDP by 20–25% by 2020 (from 2005 baseline)
›Achieved 12% reduction in emission intensity 2005–2010
›India = low-carbon economy (World Bank study)
›Advocates collaborative R&D in low-carbon technology and access to IPRs as global public goods
›*Observed climate changes in India (NATCOM to UNFCCC):**
›Surface temperature: +0.4°C increase over past century; warming trend along west coast, central India, NE India; COOLING trend in NW India and parts of South India
›Monsoon: no significant all-India trend; regional variations — west coast/N. Andhra/NW India show +10–12%; eastern MP, NE India, parts of Gujarat/Kerala show −6–8%
›Sea level rise: 1.06–1.75 mm/year (north Indian Ocean, 40+ years records) — consistent with global IPCC estimates of 1–2 mm/year
›Extreme weather: overall increasing trend in severe storm incidence along coast (0.011 events/year); West Bengal and Gujarat increasing; Odisha declining
›*Himalayan glaciers:**
›Himalayas have one of the largest snow/ice resources; feeds Indus, Ganga, Brahmaputra
›Glacial melt may affect long-term lean-season flows, hydropower generation
›Monitoring data shows recession in some Himalayan regions, but trend NOT consistent across entire mountain chain
›*Adaptation and Mitigation sectors:**
›Agriculture: Crop Insurance Scheme, Credit Support Mechanism for climate-risk farmers; development of arid-land crops
›Expenditure on climate adaptation: >2.6% of GDP by government
›*Carbon sequestration strategies (Ch. 21):**
›Three main types: Ocean, Geologic (largest potential for near-term application), Terrestrial
›Green Carbon: photosynthesis-based storage in plants and soil; forests store carbon over decades/centuries
›Blue Carbon: tidal marshes, mangroves, seagrasses — stores up to 5x more carbon per sq. mile than temperate/tropical forests; found in all continents except Antarctica
›Carbon credit = right to emit 1 tonne CO₂ equivalent; tradeable certificate
›CDM (Clean Development Mechanism): companies in developed countries earn credits by funding eco-friendly projects in developing countries
apmc agricultural marketinggm crops and agriculture policygreen revolution and food securitymsp and agricultural pricingpm kisan and income supportrural development credit diversification
Ozone Depletion — Causes, Chemistry, and Protocols
›*Ozone chemistry:**
›Ozone absorbs UV light efficiently; acts like a sun-screen
›UV rays directly damage DNA/genetic material of animal and plant cells
+ 40 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Ozone (O₃) is an allotrope of oxygen with three atoms. It exists in two forms:
- **Tropospheric ozone:** "bad ozone" — ground-level pollutant; contributes to smog; harmful to breathe
- **Stratospheric ozone:** "good ozone" — absorbs UV radiation, especially UV-B; protects life on Earth
The ozone layer has been depleted primarily by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other halogenated compounds through catalytic reactions.
All key facts
›*Ozone chemistry:**
›Ozone absorbs UV light efficiently; acts like a sun-screen
›UV rays directly damage DNA/genetic material of animal and plant cells
›UV light also acts on immune system making body susceptible to diseases
›Without ozone layer: life on Earth as we know it could not exist
›*Ozone depletion over Antarctica:**
›Only ~50% of original ozone remains over Antarctic
›Actual realisation of ozone-depletion came in 1985
›"Ozone hole" = severely thinned ozone layer over Antarctica; develops late August to early October
›*CFC mechanism:**
›CFCs = chlorofluorocarbons; composed of chlorine, fluorine, carbon
›Uses: refrigerants, aerosol propellants, foam blowing agents (2/3 as refrigerants, 1/3 as foaming agents), fire extinguishing agents, solvents for electronic/metallic components, food freezing
›Low ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential) — ideally zero
›Low GWP (Global Warming Potential)
›CFC-12 (R-12) widely used refrigerant; HFC-134a (R-134a) = most promising alternative
›*Effects of ozone depletion:**
›Skin cancer (UV-B causes various types)
›Cataracts and inflammation of cornea (UV-B damages eyes)
›Damage to skin cells, premature ageing of skin
›Harm to all plants and animals; could affect marine phytoplankton
›*Montreal Protocol:**
›Signed in Montreal, Canada, 1987; effective 1989
›Controls emission of ozone-depleting substances (ODS)
›Led to phase-out of CFCs in developed countries
›Kigali Amendment (2016): adds phase-down of HFCs (which replaced CFCs but are potent GHGs)
Impacts of Climate Change — Global and Indian Context
›*Global warming definition:**
›"An average increase in the temperature of the atmosphere near the Earth's surface and in the troposphere, which can contribute to changes in global climate patterns."
›Earth has warmed at unprecedented rate over last 100 years; particularly last two decades
+ 29 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Climate change causes a cascade of environmental impacts — from melting ice caps to shifting disease vectors. UPSC tests both global impacts and India-specific observations. Key distinction: climate (long-term average) vs weather (short-term); climate change = measurable shifts in temperature, rainfall, snow, and wind patterns over decades.
All key facts
›*Global warming definition:**
›"An average increase in the temperature of the atmosphere near the Earth's surface and in the troposphere, which can contribute to changes in global climate patterns."
›Earth has warmed at unprecedented rate over last 100 years; particularly last two decades
›2016 = hottest year on record worldwide
›*Impacts of global warming:**
›Rise in sea level (thermal expansion + ice melt)
›Changes in rainfall patterns
›Increased likelihood of extreme events: heat waves, flooding, hurricanes
›Melting of ice caps and glaciers
›Widespread vanishing of animal populations due to habitat loss
›Spread of diseases (malaria vectors expanding range)
›Bleaching of coral reefs
›Loss of plankton due to warming seas
›El Niño effect becomes more frequent/intense
›*India-specific climate observations (from NATCOM to UNFCCC):**
›Surface temperature: +0.4°C increase over past century
›Warming trends: west coast, central India, interior peninsula, NE India
›Cooling trends: NW India and parts of South India
›Monsoon: no significant all-India trend, but regional variations
›Increasing rainfall: west coast, N. Andhra Pradesh, NW India (+10 to +12%)
›Decreasing rainfall: E. Madhya Pradesh, NE India, parts of Gujarat, Kerala (−6 to −8%)
›Sea level rise: 1.06–1.75 mm/year (north Indian Ocean)
›Storm incidence increasing along coasts: 0.011 events/year; West Bengal and Gujarat increasing; Odisha declining
›*Himalayan glaciers:**
›Himalayas = one of largest resources of snow and ice globally
›Water stress from changing monsoon patterns and glacier retreat
apmc agricultural marketinggm crops and agriculture policygreen revolution and food securitymsp and agricultural pricingpm kisan and income supportrural development credit diversification
Paris Agreement — Article 6 Carbon Markets
›**Nature:** International treaty on climate change, signed in 2016, covering mitigation, adaptation, and finance.
›**Negotiation:** Negotiated by 196 parties at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) near Paris, France.
›**Signature & Entry into Force:** Opened for signature on 22 April 2016 (Earth Day) at UN Headquarters, New York; entered into force on 4 November 2016.
+ 11 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
The Paris Agreement is an international treaty on climate change, signed in 2016, covering climate change mitigation, adaptation, and finance. Negotiated by 196 parties at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) near Paris, it provides the foundational framework for global climate action in the 21st century.
A primary goal of the agreement is to limit the rise in global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, with an ambitious pursuit of limiting it to 1.5 °C. For UPSC Prelims, understanding this temperature target, the bottom-up approach of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and its distinction from the Kyoto Protocol is crucial for grasping international environmental governance and India's commitments.
All key facts
›**Nature:** International treaty on climate change, signed in 2016, covering mitigation, adaptation, and finance.
›**Negotiation:** Negotiated by 196 parties at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) near Paris, France.
›**Signature & Entry into Force:** Opened for signature on 22 April 2016 (Earth Day) at UN Headquarters, New York; entered into force on 4 November 2016.
›**Parties:** As of January 2026, 194 members of the UNFCCC are parties to the agreement; Iran is noted as a major emitter that has not ratified.
›**US Status:** The United States withdrew in 2020, rejoined in 2021, and reportedly withdrew again in 2026.
›**Long-term Temperature Goal (Article 2(a)):** To hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5 °C.
›**Emissions Reduction:** Aims for global peaking of greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible and net zero emissions by the middle of the 21st century. To stay below 1.5 °C, emissions need to be cut by roughly 50% by 2030.
›**Adaptation Goal (Article 2(b)):** To increase the ability to adapt to adverse climate change impacts and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development, without threatening food production.
›**Finance Goal (Article 2(c)):** To make finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.
›**Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs):** Under the agreement, each country must determine, plan, and regularly report on its contributions; targets should go beyond previous ones.
›**Differentiation:** In contrast to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the distinction between developed and developing countries is blurred, requiring both to submit plans for emission reductions.
›**Predecessors:** Builds upon the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, adopted at 1992 Earth Summit) and followed the Kyoto Protocol (1997, extended to 2020).
›**Leadership:** Christiana Figueres, UNFCCC executive secretary, was instrumental in regaining negotiation momentum after the Copenhagen Accord's failure.
›**Legal Nature:** No mechanism forces specific emissions targets, but the agreement includes a mechanism for increased ambition over time.
Social Cost of Carbon
›**Definition:** SCC quantifies the economic damages, typically in dollars per ton, from emitting one additional ton of carbon dioxide (CO2).
›**Purpose:** It is used by policymakers for regulatory impact analyses, investment decisions, cost-benefit assessments, and climate policy development.
›**Origin of Externalities:** The concept of pricing environmental externalities was first proposed by economist Arthur Pigou in 1912.
+ 10 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) is an economic estimate, typically expressed in dollars per ton, of the total monetary damages associated with emitting one additional ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It quantifies the long-term economic harm from climate change, encompassing diverse impacts such as agricultural losses, adverse health effects, infrastructure damage from sea-level rise, and degradation of ecosystem services.
For UPSC Prelims, understanding the SCC is crucial as it provides policymakers with a vital tool for cost-benefit analyses of climate policies, informing regulatory impact assessments, and guiding investment decisions related to greenhouse gas emissions. By translating the environmental impact of carbon into tangible economic terms, it helps governments make evidence-based decisions for climate action and sustainable development.
All key facts
›**Definition:** SCC quantifies the economic damages, typically in dollars per ton, from emitting one additional ton of carbon dioxide (CO2).
›**Purpose:** It is used by policymakers for regulatory impact analyses, investment decisions, cost-benefit assessments, and climate policy development.
›**Origin of Externalities:** The concept of pricing environmental externalities was first proposed by economist Arthur Pigou in 1912.
›**Quantification Pioneer:** Economist William Nordhaus introduced the Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy (DICE) model in the early 1990s, one of the first Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) to estimate greenhouse gas externality costs.
›**Distinction from Carbon Pricing:** SCC is distinct from direct carbon pricing tools such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, although both relate to carbon costs.
›**Early Carbon Pricing Schemes:** The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) launched in 2005, and New Zealand's ETS in 2008.
›**US Formalization:** The United States formalized the SCC under President Barack Obama in 2010, with an Interagency Working Group (IWG) using IAMs like DICE, FUND, and PAGE.
›**IWG Updates and Reinstatement:** The U.S. IWG estimates were updated in 2013 and 2016. President Joe Biden reinstated the IWG in 2021 via Executive Order 13990.
›**Global Adoption:** SCC or similar approaches are employed by approximately 40 governments and 25 sub-governmental entities worldwide.
›**Country-specific Implementations:** Examples include Canada integrating SCC into fuel pricing regulations, the UK and France applying "shadow pricing" in regulatory impact assessments, and Germany introducing the GIVE model in 2024.
›**Key Calculation Factors:** Influencing factors include climate sensitivity, economic growth projections, the chosen discount rate, the scope of damages (global vs. domestic), and the inclusion of non-market damages.
›**Discount Rate Importance:** This rate determines how future damages are valued today; a low discount rate (e.g., 1-2%) gives more weight to future generations' welfare, while a high rate (e.g., 4-5%) prioritizes present benefits.
›**Trend in Discount Rates:** Recent literature increasingly supports the use of declining discount rates, which start higher but decrease over long time horizons, reflecting long-term uncertainty and ethical considerations.
Ocean Acidification
›Oceans absorb a significant quantity, about one-third, of the CO2 produced by anthropogenic activities. (p. 211)
›Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the pH of ocean surface waters has decreased by about 0.1 pH units. (p. 211)
›The 0.1 pH unit decrease represents a 26% increase in the ocean's hydrogen ion concentration. (p. 211)
+ 7 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Ocean Acidification is the ongoing change in ocean chemistry, characterized by the lowering of ocean pH, driven by the absorption of atmospheric carbon compounds. The ocean acts as a significant reservoir, absorbing about one-third of the CO2 produced by human activities. As this uptake increases, it surpasses the ocean's natural buffering capacity, leading to an increase in hydrogen ion concentration, a decrease in carbonate ion concentration, and a reduction in pH, making the oceans less alkaline.
The primary ecological impact of acidification is on marine calcifying organisms, such as corals, molluscs, and some plankton. These organisms rely on carbonate ions to build their calcium carbonate shells and skeletons. The reduced availability of these ions makes calcification more difficult. Furthermore, acidification causes the "saturation horizon"—the depth below which calcium carbonate dissolves—to rise closer to the surface. This exposes more marine life to undersaturated water, making their shells and skeletons vulnerable to dissolution.
All key facts
›Oceans absorb a significant quantity, about one-third, of the CO2 produced by anthropogenic activities. (p. 211)
›Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the pH of ocean surface waters has decreased by about 0.1 pH units. (p. 211)
›The 0.1 pH unit decrease represents a 26% increase in the ocean's hydrogen ion concentration. (p. 211)
›The ocean currently has a pH of around 8.0, making it 'basic' or alkaline. (p. 211)
›Aragonite, a form of calcium carbonate found in most corals and mollusks, is more soluble than the calcite form. (p. 211)
›Acid rain can have a pH between 1 and 6 and has a local and regional impact on ocean acidification, but a very small effect globally. (p. 211)
›Eutrophication in coastal waters from nutrient inputs can lead to plankton blooms, and their subsequent decomposition increases CO2 and lowers pH locally. (p. 211)
›Deep, cold ocean waters are naturally undersaturated with carbonate ions, causing the shells of most calcifying organisms to dissolve at these depths. (p. 212)
›The saturation horizons for both aragonite and calcite have moved closer to the surface compared to their levels in the 1800s. (p. 212)
›The ocean has a long-term stabilizing feedback called carbonate compensation, which buffers acidification over a timescale of a thousand years. (p. 213)
eutrophicationupwellingcarbon cyclecoral reefs
Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering
›Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) is a form of geoengineering aimed at reducing global warming by increasing Earth's albedo (reflectivity).
›It is intended to *complement*, not replace, greenhouse gas emission reduction efforts.
›The most-researched SRM method is Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), which involves introducing small reflective particles into the upper atmosphere.
+ 9 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Solar Radiation Modification (SRM), also known as solar geoengineering or albedo modification, refers to a suite of large-scale approaches designed to reduce global warming. These methods primarily aim to increase the amount of sunlight reflected away from Earth and back into space, thereby cooling the planet. SRM is intended to complement, rather than replace, ongoing efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
This concept is crucial for UPSC Prelims as it represents a potential, albeit controversial, climate change mitigation strategy alongside emission reductions and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). Unlike other methods, SRM could reduce global temperatures within months of deployment. However, it does not address the root cause of climate change – atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations – meaning issues like ocean acidification would persist. Its rapid effect and potential for unilateral deployment also raise significant governance questions.
All key facts
›Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) is a form of geoengineering aimed at reducing global warming by increasing Earth's albedo (reflectivity).
›It is intended to *complement*, not replace, greenhouse gas emission reduction efforts.
›The most-researched SRM method is Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), which involves introducing small reflective particles into the upper atmosphere.
›Other approaches include Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB), which increases the reflectivity of clouds over oceans, and constructing Space Sunshades or Mirrors.
›SRM could reduce global temperatures within *months* of deployment, offering a rapid effect on warming.
›A 1% increase in planetary albedo could reduce radiative forcing by 2.35 W/m², with a 2% increase potentially counteracting warming from a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
›Crucially, SRM *does not* reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, meaning effects like ocean acidification would persist.
›The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report emphasizes that SRM is *not a substitute* for emissions reductions or Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), stating it is, at best, a supplement.
›Historically, the concept was first mentioned in a 1965 U.S. President's Science Advisory Committee report; Russian climatologist Mikhail Budyko suggested stratospheric aerosols in 1974; Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen advocated for SRM research in 2006.
›Key reports evaluating SRM include those from The Royal Society (2009), US National Academies (2015, 2021), UNEP (2023), and UNESCO (2023).
›Growing interest in SRM is driven by continued global warming and slow progress in emission reductions, as highlighted by reports like the UNEP 2024 Emissions Gap Report (projecting 3.1 °C warming under current policies).
›Currently, no comprehensive global framework exists to regulate SRM research or deployment.
Direct Air Capture (DAC)
›Direct Air Capture (DAC) extracts CO2 directly from ambient air using chemical or physical processes.
›The combination of DAC with safe long-term sequestration is known as DACCS, leading to carbon dioxide removal (CDR).
›DAC and DACCS are classified as Negative Emissions Technologies (NETs).
+ 12 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Direct Air Capture (DAC) is an innovative technology that employs chemical or physical processes to extract carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from the ambient air. When this captured CO2 is subsequently stored safely long-term, the overall process is termed Direct Air Carbon Capture and Sequestration (DACCS), directly achieving carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Such systems are vital Negative Emissions Technologies (NETs) aimed at reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
Unlike traditional Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), which captures CO2 from concentrated point sources like industrial exhaust stacks, DAC operates on diffuse atmospheric CO2. This distinction makes DAC particularly important for addressing emissions from non-stationary sources, such as airplanes or distributed emissions, which cannot be captured at source. Its potential to actively reduce global atmospheric CO2 levels makes it a significant concept for climate change mitigation efforts, particularly for achieving net-zero targets.
All key facts
›Direct Air Capture (DAC) extracts CO2 directly from ambient air using chemical or physical processes.
›The combination of DAC with safe long-term sequestration is known as DACCS, leading to carbon dioxide removal (CDR).
›DAC and DACCS are classified as Negative Emissions Technologies (NETs).
›DAC differs from Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) by capturing CO2 from diffuse atmospheric air rather than point sources (e.g., factories, power plants).
›DAC can capture emissions from non-stationary sources like airplanes, which are challenging for traditional CCS.
›The DAC process typically involves contacting ambient air with chemical media (aqueous alkaline solvents or solid sorbents), followed by applying energy (usually heat) to separate the CO2 and regenerate the media.
›As of 2023, the cost for smaller DAC plants (e.g., <50,000 tonnes CO2 per annum, like Climeworks Mammoth) exceeds US$1000 per tonne of CO2, significantly higher than current carbon prices.
›Projected costs for large-scale DAC plants (1 million tonnes per annum, Mtpa, and above) are estimated to be within US$94–232 per tonne of CO2 removed.
›DAC technology was first suggested in 1999 and is still undergoing development, with commercial plants operating or planned in Europe and the US.
›The three main stages of CO2 capture in DAC are the contacting stage, the capture stage, and the separation stage.
›Two mature DAC technologies for industrial deployment are Solid Sorbent DAC (S-DAC), which typically uses low-temperature processes, and Liquid Sorbent DAC (L-DAC), which can use low or high-temperature processes.
›Emerging DAC technologies include Electro-Swing Adsorption (ESA), Moisture-Swing Adsorption (MSA), and Membrane-based DAC (m-DAC).
›Most commercial DAC techniques utilize liquid solvents, often amine-based or caustic (e.g., sodium hydroxide), to absorb CO2.
›Moisture-swing adsorption, developed by Klaus Lackner, uses an anionic exchange polymer resin that absorbs CO2 when dry and releases it when exposed to moisture, with energy largely from the latent heat of water.
›Other materials explored for DAC include Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and semi-permeable polymeric membranes for membrane-based separation (m-DAC), the latter requiring less water and having a smaller footprint.
Carbon Fertilization Effect on Plants
›The Carbon Fertilization Effect causes increased photosynthesis and limited leaf transpiration due to higher atmospheric CO2 levels.
›The effect's intensity varies based on plant species, air/soil temperature, and water/nutrient availability.
›It has been reported as the cause for 44% of the increase in Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) since the 2000s.
+ 13 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
The Carbon Fertilization Effect describes the phenomenon where increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) lead to an accelerated rate of photosynthesis and a reduction in leaf transpiration in plants. This effect varies significantly depending on factors like plant species, ambient temperature, and the availability of water and nutrients. While it can lead to an increase in Net Primary Productivity (NPP) and has been linked to a 44% rise in Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) since the 2000s, this does not consistently translate into enhanced overall plant growth or substantial long-term carbon storage in all cases.
This concept is vital for UPSC Prelims as it touches upon critical aspects of climate change, the global carbon cycle, and food security. Terrestrial ecosystems, influenced by this effect, have historically absorbed CO2, partially mitigating climate change and contributing to significant global "greening" since the early 1980s. However, the capacity of this effect to significantly reduce atmospheric CO2 in the long run is limited by increasing anthropogenic emissions. Furthermore, a negative consequence is the potential reduction in the nutritional quality of essential food crops, impacting global and India's food security strategies.
All key facts
›The Carbon Fertilization Effect causes increased photosynthesis and limited leaf transpiration due to higher atmospheric CO2 levels.
›The effect's intensity varies based on plant species, air/soil temperature, and water/nutrient availability.
›It has been reported as the cause for 44% of the increase in Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) since the 2000s.
›Terrestrial ecosystems have partially mitigated climate change by reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
›The plant response is unlikely to significantly reduce atmospheric CO2 over the next century due to increasing anthropogenic influences.
›Earth's vegetated lands have shown significant greening since the early 1980s, largely attributed to rising atmospheric CO2.
›Theory predicts the tropics to have the largest CO2 uptake due to this effect, but this has not been widely observed.
›Changes in atmospheric CO2 may reduce the nutritional quality of some crops, e.g., wheat showing less protein and certain minerals.
›Common food crops could experience a reduction of protein, iron, and zinc content by 3% to 17%.
›Plant growth plays a critical role in storing carbon, with approximately 19% of Earth's carbon stored in plants.
›With higher CO2, plants can grow better and store more carbon in permanent structures like wood.
›Mechanisms for enhanced growth include overcoming carbon/light limitation, improved water use efficiency due to reduced stomatal conductance, and better nutrient acquisition via mycorrhizal fungi.
Human Alteration of the Carbon Cycle
›Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a primary greenhouse gas that is naturally present in the atmosphere as part of the Earth’s carbon cycle—
Tap to read full passage
▾ Full passage
Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a primary greenhouse gas that is naturally present in the atmosphere as part of the Earth’s carbon cycle—
Carbon Capture and Sequestration
›**IPCC Definition:** The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) defines CCS as a process where a relatively pure stream of CO2 from industrial and energy-related sources is separated (captured), conditioned, compressed, and transported to a storage location for long-term isolation from the atmosphere.
›**CCS vs. CCUS:** Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) are closely related; CCUS highlights the economic benefit of utilizing captured CO2, predominantly for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), before storage.
›**Primary Utilization (EOR):** Approximately 80% of CO2 captured annually is used for EOR, where it is injected into partially depleted oil reservoirs to extract more oil and then largely left underground.
+ 13 facts · tap to read
▾ Full passage
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a process designed to mitigate climate change by preventing carbon dioxide (CO2) from entering the atmosphere. It involves separating CO2 from large point sources, such as industrial installations or natural gas processing plants, before it is released, and then transporting it to a long-term storage location, typically deep geological formations, for isolation. This technology is often expanded to Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS), where the captured CO2 is used, primarily in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).
For UPSC Prelims, CCS/CCUS is a critical topic under Environment and Climate Change due to its potential role in achieving emission reduction targets and net-zero goals, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors like heavy industry. Aspirants should understand its mechanism, current status, limitations, and its intersection with energy policy and other climate mitigation strategies like Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS).
All key facts
›**IPCC Definition:** The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) defines CCS as a process where a relatively pure stream of CO2 from industrial and energy-related sources is separated (captured), conditioned, compressed, and transported to a storage location for long-term isolation from the atmosphere.
›**CCS vs. CCUS:** Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) are closely related; CCUS highlights the economic benefit of utilizing captured CO2, predominantly for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), before storage.
›**Primary Utilization (EOR):** Approximately 80% of CO2 captured annually is used for EOR, where it is injected into partially depleted oil reservoirs to extract more oil and then largely left underground.
›**Storage Location:** The captured CO2 is typically stored in deep geological formations.
›**Historical Origins:** Processes involved in CCS were first used by oil and gas companies in the mid-20th century, mainly to purify natural gas and increase oil production.
›**GHG Reduction Focus:** Discussion around CCS as a strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions began in the 1980s and gained significant momentum in the 2000s.
›**Current Scale (2024):** As of 2024, CCS was in operation at 44 plants worldwide, collectively capturing about one-thousandth of global carbon dioxide emissions.
›**Industry Dominance:** Approximately 90% of CCS operations as of 2024 involved the oil and gas industry.
›**Energy Intensity:** Plants utilizing CCS require more energy to operate, often leading to the burning of additional fossil fuels.
›From 2002 to 2014, plants showed an increased CO2 uptake, temporarily stabilizing the rate of CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere.
›A 1993 review of greenhouse studies found that a doubling of CO2 stimulated growth in 156 plant species by an average of 37%, with significant species-specific variation (e.g., cotton doubled, maize 20%).
›Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) experiments, using lower CO2 levels (475–600 ppm) in field conditions, showed an average 17% gain in crop yield, with legumes responding more than C4 plants.
›Satellite measurements indicate increasing leaf area index (greening) for 25% to 50% of Earth's vegetated area over the past 35 years.
›
**Niche Applications:** CCS is envisioned for a critical but limited role, most useful in specific niches such as heavy industry, plant retrofits, and for reducing emissions from natural gas processing.
›**BECCS Link:** CCS is a component of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), which can, under certain conditions, remove carbon from the atmosphere.
›**Effectiveness Factors:** The effectiveness of CCS in reducing carbon emissions depends on the plant's capture efficiency, the additional energy used for CCS itself, potential leakage, and business/technical operational issues.
›**Government Support:** Almost all CCS projects operating today have benefited from government financial support.
›**Supporting Countries:** Countries with programs to support or mandate CCS technologies include the US, Canada, Denmark, China, and the UK.
›**Terminology Evolution:** Prior to 2013, the process was primarily called CCS; in 2013, the term CCUS was introduced to highlight its potential economic benefit, subsequently gaining popularity.
›**Other CO2 Utilization:** Around 1% of captured CO2 is used as a feedstock for products like fertilizer, fuels, and plastics; however, this only qualifies as CCS if the carbon is durably stored and not released upon consumption or burning.